Three More Tropes I Hate

I am back once again with a healthy dose of negativity. I’ve already posted five tropes I hate, and it was only a matter of time before I got around to posting a few more. Why three and not five? Because I thought of three off the top of my head and decided to be irregular about it.

Just a reminder, these are my dislikes, not yours. If you disagree, that’s great. But don’t try to change my mind.

  1. Good Girl/Bad Boy– We know this story. She’s a good girl. If she’s young, she’s a good student, model child. If she’s older, then she’s sweet, possibly innocent, a hard worker, and rule follower. An occasional glass of wine is the most drinking she’ll do. He’s a bad boy. In school, he’s flunking grades and causing trouble. Outside of school, he continues his rule breaking ways, maybe straying into lawbreaking ways. He drinks, he smokes, he probably wears a leather jacket to show his disdain for authority. The idea behind the couple is an opposites attract situation. Of course the good girl would be attracted to the bad boy and vice versa. They both have qualities that the other admires and/or needs. The bad boy can loosen up the uptight good girl and the good girl can instill some discipline and respect in the bad boy. I suppose it’s all fine in theory, but too often it comes across as the “I can change him” fairy tale that’s been the unrealistic foundation of cis het relationships for far too long. Worse, the good girl so believes her love has changed her bad boy that she refuses to see that her man hasn’t transformed a lick, like in the Hawaii Five-O episode “Engaged to Be Buried”. He’s a daddy’s boy who killed your friend and threatened to kill your father. Why are you crying over him? Throw the whole man away.
  2. Oh no! A Girl!– I want to say that this trope has been left in the past, but I know better than to get my hopes up. The trope is a play on the woman in a man’s job stereotype. The men are so weirded out that there’s a GIRL in their midst doing a MAN’S job that their brains short out and they act like the biggest misogynistic assholes shat out of a writer’s pen. There are two main reasons that this trope makes my eye twitch. The first is that it makes the characters we’ve come to know and love unlikable, and in some cases barely indistinguishable from some of the jerks already dealt with in the series. The second is that the women are frequently written to be annoying in their insistence on proving they’re worthy of the job. While that does have the basis in some truth (women have to work twice as hard to be considered half as good), they don’t have to be aggravating about it. Between the men and the women being annoying, I’m irritated and can’t enjoy the episode. One twist on this trope was in an episode of Chopper One called “Deadly Carrier” in which Burdick was first surprised that the doctor was a woman and then proceeded to treat her with a disrespect he’d never show a male doctor. This was later played off as bickering for sexual tension, which means the episode just went from one of my hated to tropes to another.
  3. Let’s Add a Kid– It’s probably most popular to do on a sitcom. The original children are getting older and less cute, so let’s remedy that by adding new children. The Brady Bunch is probably the most notorious for this because of Cousin Oliver (the scapegoat for the show’s cancellation even though the obvious declining quality of episodes is right there), but other shows have done it, too. On Roseanne, the kids were all grown or nearly so when she decided she wanted another baby and they ended up with Jerry. On Step by Step, the blended family ended up with a half-sister when the six kids started hitting puberty. Even Little House on the Prairie featured an influx of orphaned children when Mary and Laura got married and Carrie was one of the older kids at the schoolhouse. The one that irks me the most is on Family Matters. The Winslows started out with three kids -Eddie, Laura, and Judy- and Harriet’s sister Rachel had a baby named Richie. They ended up writing Judy off the show (pretty much Chuck Cunninghamed her) claiming they didn’t have enough stories for her, but then when Richie got older a few seasons later, he suddenly acquired a friend named 3J that ended up living with the Winslows. Didn’t even utilize all of the children they had, but still had to get another one. Guess they thought no one would notice due to all of the Urkel happening at the time.

Do these trope dislikes age me? Make me come across as a crusty, disgruntled old woman?

Good.

There will be more.

Book ’em, Danno–Episode 70

We’re officially at the half-way point of Season 6! Time flies when you’re having fun catching bad guys.

First, Five-O deals with a group doing a little nuclear blackmail in “Anybody Can Build a Bomb” and then untangles a murder mystery involving an unconventional lottery in “Try to Die on Time”.

Both episodes have minor trigger warnings for mentions of suicide in the discussion and allusions to it in the episodes themselves.

Listen on Soundcloud, Apples Podcasts, and Spotify.

Apologies for the background noise. Cold Case Files and Murder, She Wrote were particularly loud in the next room this time.

Please enjoy this showcase of Five-O street wear.

The Truth Is Always Best…Unless You’re a Cop

Despite my love of cop shows, I’ve never really been into the Law & Order franchise. Never had the urge or inclination to watch any of the shows. Then Charge changed their line-up, I was too lazy to change the channel, and now I’m hooked on Law & Order: Criminal Intent. I blame Vincent D’Onofrio and Kathryn Erbe.

The character of Detective Robert Goren says at one point during the final season that everybody lies all the time. Granted, this is said during a therapy session because my guy has some issues and he learned this lesson from his father telling him to lie to his mother about his father’s affairs, but it sort of makes sense that he would believe that anyway since he kind of lives this truth in his work. During the course of their investigations, he and Detective Alex Eames lie a whole lot to suspects. They lie about evidence, they lie about conversations, they lie about circumstances. I’m not talking about undercover work -though they do that a bit in the series. I’m talking about straight up lying to the people they’re questioning.

This behavior is totally legal. Cops are allowed to lie to the people they’re questioning. Just another reason why it’s important for folks to exercise their rights and ask for a lawyer.

But these are the good guys. Their lies are justified. It’s all in the pursuit of justice. Evidence is fine. A confession is better. In the world of fictional cops, confessions aren’t just the goal; they’re the norm. There’s a narrative to be served here.

Goren and Eames do have their own moral code when it comes to lying to suspects. For example, they won’t pressure a mentally fragile suspect, but instead lie and manipulate the suspect’s psychiatrist, who is responsible for the suspect’s destroyed mental state and ultimately, his crime.

They also right a wrong of a coerced confession from a group of minors accused of assaulting a woman. The cops in the interrogation video don’t do anything that Goren and Eames haven’t done before -lying to and manipulating their suspects- but the difference is these boys are innocent and the cops know it.

Fun fact: it only became illegal in Illinois for cops to lie to minors they’re interrogating in 2022. It’s still legal in other states. This is also why it’s important for minors to know their rights and for their guardians to know them, too.

I know it seems like I’m picking on Law & Order: Criminal Intent, but this is prevalent in just about every cop show. Steve McGarrett wasn’t above lying to suspects on Hawaii Five-O. In the case of some criminals, I think he took a certain amount of pleasure in lying to them just to see the look on their faces when they were caught. He had mean streak when it came to justice.

I’m sure that even the saintly Barney Miller lied to a suspect or two, but I can’t remember any instances off hand and I’m too lazy to do any research on it. It’s not like the 12th precinct arrested the kind of criminals the required an intensive interrogation. Most of them were caught in the act anyway.

The point of copaganda is to normalize some of the worst behaviors of the police and though it is legal for cops to lie to suspects during questioning, it doesn’t necessarily make it a good thing. It’s a manipulation tactic that’s seen more than a few innocent people put behind bars.

Some things are better left to the likes of Goren and Eames.

Book ’em, Danno–Episode 69

Book 'em Danno Podcast

Political motives and personal vendettas collide in “A Bullet for El Diablo”. And then counterfeit bonds and murder are the means to a million dollars in “The Finishing Touch”.

The episodes this season have been running a bit long, so I made a conscious effort to cut down my synopsis and stop rambling so much. As a result, this episode is under an hour. I think we’re all better off.

Also, it’s episode 69, so of course it’s nice.

Listen on Soundcloud, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify.

Check out Steve McGarrett setting the sunglasses standard that Horatio Caine would later make iconic. Yes, Steve did do a “putting the sunglasses on to emphasize the dialogue” move.

Jack Lord as Steve McGarret, a serious looking white man in his fifities with brown hair wearing silver framed sunglasses and a dark blue suit.

Hyperfixation Reruns

I’ve talked before about how I can’t answer the question of what my favorite TV show is. I realized recently that I don’t have favorites because I have hyperfixations.

I’ve never been officially diagnosed with any neurodivergency, but my tendency to hyperfixate on things has been with me all of my life. When I find something that truly grabs my attention for whatever reason, I can and will deep dive on it for days, weeks, months, and sometimes, off and on for years.

With this knowledge, it should come as no surprise that some reruns have reached hyperfixation level.

There are two kinds of hyperfixation for me when I fixate on a rerun. One kind has me watching the show repeatedly and picking it apart, wanting to analyze it and write about every conclusion I come to. I don’t share everything I write, obviously, but believe me, it happens. CSI: Miami is probably the most recent hyperfixation rerun of this type. I’ve pulled that show apart and looked at it from all angles and analyzed all sorts of bits and pieces. I’ve written about it. I’ve kept much of what I want to write about it to myself because I don’t want to overwhelm you. My analysis is stunning in a “get a life” sort of way.

The other kind of hyperfixation is when merely watching and analyzing isn’t enough. I have to learn everything I can about the show, the behind-the-scenes stories, and the people who made it. Jack Webb shows fit this bill. It wasn’t enough for me to watch Dragnet, Adam-12, and Emergency! multiple times and analyze the episodes and characters and cases. I had to dig into the background of the shows and learn about the creator and the actors. I had to know more about them than would be asked on Jeopardy. And then once that was satiated, I was able to move on.

Why do I fixate on the shows that I do? I have no idea. Something about them captures my attention and triggers something that makes it hard for me to let it go. I do not know what that magical attribute is because I’ve fixated on a variety of reruns over the years. Okay, yes, there have been a lot of cop shows, but there have been other, decidedly not cop shows, too. The answer isn’t that simple.

How long do the fixations last? It depends. When it comes to reruns, it averages a few months. Typically, enough time to watch the series through multiple times and let my brain mull it over and pick its bones clean. Some shows stay in my brain for much longer; others fall out of my head in record time. The length of time I spend fixating on a show doesn’t seem to affect the intensity. It’s called a hyperfixation for a reason. Regardless of the time spent, the focus is intense.

The one good thing about this particular hyperfixation thing is that it sometimes makes for some interesting blog posts about reruns. The other good thing is that I learn new things and it puts my critical thinking skills to good use in a different way.

It won’t get me rich, but I’ll have some really offbeat trivia to share in conversation.

Brace yourselves.

Book ’em, Danno–Episode 68

Book 'em Danno Podcast

The greed monster is back! First it appears in the form of a questionable inheritance company in “Why Wait ‘Til Uncle Kevin Dies?”. The company fronts heirs a portion of their inheritance before their benefactor dies and then they collect what they’re owed when the benefactor kicks it. Yeah. It’s sketchy and lends itself perfectly to murder. And then some illegal opals spark a whole lot of greed in “Flash of Color, Flash of Death”. Dollar sign obsessions can really ruin a man.

Listen on Soundcloud, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify.

Here are two ambitious men. One is a little off-beat. The other is a little unhinged. See if you can tell which is which.

Book ’em, Danno–Episode 67

Book 'em Danno Podcast

Five-O deals with a killer in their midst in “Murder Is a Taxing Affair” and then tries to keep a group of pimps from going to war with a loan shark in “Tricks Are Not Treats”. Come for the soul crushing government jobs, stay for the ’70s mack fashion.

I’m not sure why I’ve gotten so long-winded on these last few episodes. Hopefully, you’re sleeping well to my extra words.

Listen on Soundcloud, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify.

As I said in the episode, if our love doesn’t include matching vacation outfits, don’t even bother proposing.

matching vacation outfits

Book ’em, Danno–Episode 66

Book 'em Danno Podcast

Season 6 starts to find its groove with this episode. First up, we’ve got murderous hillbillies in “One Big Happy Family”, and then arson with an agenda in “The Sunday Torch”. Heads up for some racism in the former and mental illness discussion in the latter.

Listen on Soundcloud, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify.

In the meantime, please enjoy Slim Pickens and Barbara Baxley straight up ruining a snobby hotel clerk’s day.

slim pickens and barbara baxley

Rerun Junkie Books–Quinn Martin, Producer by Jonathan Etter

If you’re at all into reruns (and you must be if you’re here), then you’re probably familiar with the words “a Quinn Martin production”. A legendary producer during the ’60s and ’70s, the man had a gift for running a TV show. Sure, not all of them were multi-season successes and not all of his pilots were picked up, but he’s got more than one classic to his name.

First published in 2003, Quinn Martin, Producer: A Behind-The-Scenes History of QM Productions and Its Founder by Jonathan Etter covers Quinn Martin’s career as a producer via interviews conducted during the ’90s and early ’00s with actors, writers, directors, producers, and other behind-the-scenes staff who worked with Quinn Martin and for QM Productions during its run.

Starting with an introduction that covers the early life of Quinn Martin, including how he chose his name (he was born Irwin Martin Cohn), the book then covers his career show by show, starting with his executive producing stint on The Untouchables. The book goes into detail on Martin’s hit shows like The Fugitive, The FBI, Cannon, The Streets of San Francisco, and Barnaby Jones; the one season wonders like The New Breed, The Invaders, Dan August, and Banyon; and the shows that seemed to be doomed from the start like Caribe, Bert D’Angelo/Superstar, and The Runaways.

Because the history is covered via interviews, there are some unflinching takes, some dirt dished, and some conflicting views. Lynda Day George, who was the most frequent QM guest star, gushes about her experiences on most of the shows, but also isn’t afraid to be kindly honest about less than stellar times. The interviews with the crew, particularly the writers, directors, and other producers, are fascinating, not only dishing the details of Martin’s shows, but also illuminating how television was done back in the day.

Jonathan Etter does a fine job of organizing and incorporating the interviews with his research. He even includes failed pilots, TV movies, and Martin’s brief time producing films.

As this book was first released almost 20 years ago, many of those interviewed are no longer with us. I admit that seeing some of the names (like Robert Forster) was a gut-punch of sadness. But I’m also grateful that these experiences were preserved for posterity.

This book can be acquired at McFarland Books and Amazon.

Book ’em, Danno–Episode 65

Season 6 has barely started and we’re already to my favorite episode.

Our favorite, Dan Budnik from Eventually Supertrain joins me to talk about “Draw Me a Killer” and “Charter for Death”. Minor trigger warning for animal death for “Charter for Death”. We do discuss it.

And of course, you can find spoilers for the episodes at 47:08 to 58:47 and 1:48:30 and 2:03:55.

Listen on Soundcloud, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify.

Dan and I are covering all the topics in this episode: socks with sandals, grindhouse movies, alternate-universe Cousin Oliver, currents, comics, Bert Convy in a see-through shirt. You’re not going to want to miss a second.